Monday, April 6, 2015

闲话女强人


一直觉得很有必要来讨论下这个话题,原因是“女强人”这个称号不是一个绝对的褒义或者贬义的词,有幸获得这个称号的也因此悲喜参半。下面都是自己的看法,观念不一定对,但目的是为了让大家来思考下,无论有没有这个称号都能活得更happy就好了。

1. 谁是女强人?

首先,女强人这个称号给人滥用了,大大滥用了。如果你只是个working mother,是个很忙很累一肚子委屈的working mother,那先别叽歪,你还不一定是。为什么要强调这个呢?因为这点很重要。可以说,凡是凭自己力量来美的女生,当年在国内大学都是学习不错的。要是理工出身,那更是秒杀成群的男生,被冠以女强人的称号是常有的。总的来说,这个称号是对当事人的一种肯定,无论学术上还是性格上。坏处是什么呢?如果你一路都顺顺利利,找到如意郎君,光找到还不行,还要保证生活和睦,还要生得出孩子,孩子也没有任何缺陷,也都高高兴兴长大了。在这种情况下,被人叫做女强人可谓锦上添花。但这些方面哪怕有一个出了问题,就给归到女强人这个称号上了。“你吧,就是太优秀了,所以没人敢追。”每次我听人这么讲就想呼那人一巴掌,不管他讲的是不是我。你说你这么讲是什么目的呢?“那个女的,你看,年轻时候忙事业去了,结果现在想生孩子生不出来了。”“那两个孩儿真倒霉!他妈整天顾着上班/做生意/往上爬,都不怎么管。结果没一个考上常春藤。”“我要是她老公,我也跟她离。整天见不到人。”

哪个人是没缺点的?哪个人的生活是完美的?别人遇到不如意,不同情就罢了,把这些根源都归到这人太优秀上面,不是她的错也都成了她的错。不仅没有帮她度过难关,反而连原本是她生活中的亮点也一笔抹杀,同时证明给后人看,“想跟男人抢世界,这就是下场。”

所以我一直认为,无论东西方,性别歧视的真正体现,不是找工作加薪时候的不公,而是通过舆论的方式,给职业女性施加无形的压力。这种看不见的力量才是最可怕,也正因为看不见摸不着,才难以制止和改善。我国内的大学不是什么top,因为是工科,男女比例九比一左右。曾在学院考过第二,不过我们二到五名分差的不大,第一名把我们甩的老远(那人大家开玩笑说是集男女特长于一身,有点东方不败的特点。开玩笑的!)所以可以说我那几年过得挺不开心的,原因如上所述。但是到了美国来一看,我这叫什么狗屁优秀?比我强的女的数都数不过来。上当了,早知道是这么回事儿我就更努力些了,都是给那帮唠唠叨叨的人害得(人都是喜欢把过错推给别人的)。因此我想和在座的女同胞说,你们中至少有一半以上根本算不上女强人。我也不算。如果有人跟你说,你今天的任何不如意是因为你“太好”造成的,我可以负责任的说,不是,你还不够好。解决问题的方法不是让自己变差,而是更出色。不信我问你,你的事业除了朋友和同事之外,有多少人知道,有没有一千个?当你站在人群中,你的气质,名气,或者地位能否让人一眼就注意到。跟人说话能在一分钟内就抓住人的兴趣吗?如果这些做不到,那证明还大有改善的余地。

我们学校的核心人物,精神领袖,是在这儿干了一辈子的女Provost。我新人入职party的时候还不知道她是谁,但是一眼看过去,整个会场的中心就在一个和蔼可亲的老太太那里,而不是校长那里。所有的小年轻无论男女都抢着和她合照,真是众星捧月。平常头头们有大事小事,第一个想到的就是找她解决。当然你可以说她地位在那儿,不过权力这个东西嘛,得靠两个条件,一个是官方给的,一个是自己挣来的,缺一不可。我过生日那天最早收到的祝福就是她发来的email,当然肯定是她秘书发的,肯定全校老师都有,她都不知道我是谁。但这件事证明了她在事业上的细心付出。

2. 女强人是女的吗?

提起女强人,很多人都会联想到妇女能顶半边天啊,撩起袖子干革命啊,风风火火不要命啊。这不叫女强人,这叫女汉子(春晚2015)。两性各有强弱,男女平等不是要抹杀两性差别。你看007中的女主角们,只要拎只烟出来,立马有十几个打火机凑上来。多好!俺只恨没有那么天生丽质。前一阵版上曾经讨论过这个问题,就是女发考题在找工作评tenure时倒底有没有受到照顾。若是有人对我说,你是在engineering school找到的工作,肯定受了照顾,我会说是是是,你说的对。至于倒底是不是这样,第一我不清楚,第二我不care。对于这些虚的,面子上的,嘴头上的便宜,谁爱占谁就占好了,我们要把眼睛盯在实的上面。欢迎大家来照顾,请尽量多多照顾!谁说我们弱,我们认了就是了,但要是真的有人来送钱送job了,那还客气什么,赶紧揣下不就得了。最好再写个“功德无量”的大牌子送给他,叫他以后多来。自己是如何走到今天这一步的,别人怎么评价无所谓。关键是怎样在现有的基础上,往更高的层次去迈。

我不久前参加了一个针对女中学生的Engineeringwomen啦之类的活动。跟我同在一个panel的女工程师是在波音工作的。她说曾经接过一个项目,client是军方一个老头,很目空一切的那种。她和公司的一个男下属来开会,老军官就当她是秘书用,让她记好笔记。男下属马上澄清,她才是上司。可能有些女同胞遇到这种事会很气愤,我倒觉得挺好玩的。生活中多些这种drama,才会不boring,大家这么看好吗?

3. 到底强在哪里?

这个强,是不是说要永不言败,永不低头,不丢人,不落泪?这也不是女强人,这得是女超人才行。男人也没有几个能做得到的。那这个强倒底指的是什么?我的理解是要像弹簧那样,无论给人踩得多扁,都能再弹回来,而不是就此消沉下去。具体说来有以下几点。

一,不为人言所动。前面说了,社会舆论的力量可以很大。对于别人的议论评价与建议,一定要时刻保持清醒的头脑,分清哪些是良言,哪些可以忽略。对自己的价值要有稳定的认识,不能因为谁谁谁的话就轻易改变初衷,抹杀自己的优点,放弃自己的理想。马克吐温说过,“Keep away from people who try to belittle your ambitions. Small people always do that, but the really great make you feel that you, too, can become great.”不过我倒想觉得,很多时候别人其实未必是故意的。有时候亲人好友是出于为自己好的立场才讲的。如果你够强的话,对于出言不善的人,你也可以和他们友好相处,也没有必要和他们争论,心里不当回事儿就完了。

二,要有心胸和气量。这点儿在“Faculty随想”里谈过,但这里又提出来,是因为通常女生会被认为心眼儿比较小。当然例外多的是,男生也有很小心眼儿的。总的来说,这与天性有关(我们细心照顾你的时候你又不嫌我们心眼儿小了?),但还是要克服,主要倒不是为了别人怎么看你。既然决定了不当家庭主妇,出来做事,甚至做出一番事业,那免不了会经常遇到烦心人烦心事。自己看得开看不开,对别人影响其实不大。谁要是气气你你就睡不好觉了,这个女强人的路还怎么走?对别人宽容,其实是对自己宽容。注意,这里的宽容,可不是说随便退让。意义不大的事情可以,但自己认为是重要的,不能放弃原则。一方面要不断协商,不断争取,同时又不能给它搞的心神不宁。别的事情该怎么干还得怎么干,要能继续enjoy life。跟自己说,麻烦事不是意外,而是自己工作的一部分。我这份工,我这个职位,就是来解决tough issue的,不这样还显不出我的能耐。

三,要不断学习。常听人说我们在学校待太久,找到工作都三十好几了,评上终身都四十了。言下之意就是学习是件逼不得已的事情,为的就是找个工作。应该尽快找到工作,就可以把学的东西都忘了,回家就是上网看电视,上班也不用脑,人生就完美了。人各有志吧,这我不好说什么,但是作为一个professional的话,尤其是做research的,活到老学到老是这个职业必须的。这里的学习不仅仅是科学技术,包括对周围环境变化的掌握,接人处世,语言,习俗。每次见到“能人”,想我前面说的女provost,就得瞪大眼睛,向人学习。总之是要时常保持open-minded,不断去琢磨,看看自己有哪些可以改进的。时常听人说,到了现在这个年龄,再改已经不可能了。说实话,有这种观念的人,让他回到年轻时,我也不信他能改多少。“Adaptation is the requirement for survival.(Cary Fowler)

四,花点儿心思在穿衣外貌上。每次找工作季节,都会有女同胞来版上问该不该化妆的问题。我向来是赞同化妆的,但其实我自己是挺懒的,只有在“有点儿事儿”的时候才会勉强化些。有一次一个姐妹回国,我问她是不是买了好多漂亮衣服回来,她说基本没买,因为国内衣服的风格和这里还不太一样。从那时候开始,我就留心观察,比如孩子的中文学校要是搞什么活动,我基本上可以分出哪些妈妈们的衣服或者头饰是在这里买的,哪些是国内带来的。挺无聊是不是?你可以说,这是个自由的国家,我只要没光着,爱怎么打扮就怎么打扮,那些中东妇女不是还包着头吗?那倒是,不过发考题中你见过多少包着头的?你要是在家工作,或者去公司当个螺丝钉,怎么穿戴关系不大。但现在你是要当professionalbuild up your reputation。当你的穿衣文化与别人不同的时候,你却希望别人相信你认同他们的职业文化和价值观,时间久了可以,初次见面的时候外貌很大程度上决定了别人对你的看法。

这里岔开下话题。我最早跟人说写书的时候,都问我是否和中国文化历史相关。我说一点儿关系也没有,是星球大战风格的。其实和星球大战差很远,但我想说明什么呢?我们不是只会搞红高粱之类的靠出卖中国人的落后愚昧畸形来博得西方一笑。除了在科学方面,我们在文学艺术上也能和你们产生类似的想法,达到类似的高度甚至更高。要干就干主流。

五,独立。提起女强人,大家一定会想到独立这个词。不过我这里说的独立可不是单干的意思。前面说了,要大方接受别人的帮助。这里说的独立是指在赖以生存的技能方面,一定要保证即使众叛亲离,孤家寡人了,也能存活下去。时刻清楚自己吃饭的家伙是什么,别的可以荒废了,这个不能被tampered,不能 compromised,不能给掌握到任何其他人手里。独立还有一个意思,和第一条的“不为人言所动”有关,就是说要完全自主地为自己定目标,你要做的事一定是要自己真心想做的。女人很容易犯的一个毛病是为别人而活,这从某方面说是很高尚的一种行为,但同时又很危险。无论男女,如果将人生价值,happiness,系在其他人或事上面,都很危险。当你所珍视的这种关系运行良好的时候,你可能生活很有干劲儿,任何困难都不怕。一旦这种关系被打破,会导致你的整个事业变得meaningless。“努力有什么意义,who cares?”这是我在跟“问题学生”们接触时百分百会遇到的一个状况,屡试不爽。

所以这里的独立,掺有适当的自私因素在内。也就是说,在抛开一切外在因素以后,你干的事业如果成功了,必须能够给你带来足够的满足与肯定,regardless of anything else。这样做的好处是什么呢?第一条里说了,对自己要有一种稳定,自信的evaluation。干事业虽然不容易,但毕竟是个客观的,看得见摸得着的东西。你是好是坏有证明摆在那里,不是谁想抹杀就可以抹杀的。这个世界有太多自己不能控制的因素,强的人不是他们能控制的比别人多,而是让自己less susceptible


道德经讲,“天下之至柔,驰骋天下之至坚”,“天下莫柔弱于水,而攻坚强者莫之能胜”。既生之为女人,就要接受这个事实。社会若有不公正,不是我们一时半时能够改变的。明白自己天性中的弱点,善用自己的女性资源,让辛勤耕耘带来货真价实的喜悦人生。


Friday, April 3, 2015

Airplane Thoughts

(Perfect for fans to quote me … some day in the future.)
1. Why the hard work? Writers are doing God’s job. The best part is not that they could get lost in a world they created out of nowhere, but knowing that other people, strangers included, are also able to see it. I call this “magic”.
2. A short story can only have two types of beginnings. Something has gone wrong and the solution isn’t obvious, or everything looks right with the looming possibility of messing up one of them. In fact, the two aren’t that different.
3. A good book should serve two purposes simultaneously: consolation and provocation. That is, let readers know what they think, how they feel, and why they make certain decisions are common and sharable by others. Meanwhile, show them what they have missed, what deserve a second thought, and what could have happened other ways. Lacking either aspect would weaken the strength of the other.
4. Creativity happens at those moments that would have been boring otherwise, like traveling on an airplane with electronics turned off or lying in bed at night when you are fully awake.
5. Kids get cranky on an airplane because they don’t appreciate how we fly over continents by sitting still in tiny seats.

Thursday, March 26, 2015

相声:富教授


A:有道是,名不正,言不顺啊!
B:这话怎讲?
A:我几年前就升为正教授了,可是别人都还管我叫“副教授”。
B:为什么呀?
A:我姓“富”。
B:那就对了,就该管你叫“富教授”。
A:谁富教授了?我挣这么点儿钱,有什么富了?
B:那你怨不了人家,谁叫你姓这么个姓来着?
A:不过话说回来,现在总比当学生那时候有钱了。
B:那是自然。
A:先说住房。想当年刚来美国的时候,跟一对夫妻share一个studio
B:你等等,有这么share的吗?
A:这咋了?
B:这不合适。
A:有啥不合适了?不仅不用交房租,他们还给钱我。
B:有这种好事儿?
A:人家夫妻一早就买了房了,又自家开了个网上售货公司。白天来studio上班,我反正也要去学校。晚上他们下班了,我正好回来住。
B:哦,闹了半天你是给人守仓库的呀!
A:别说得这么难听行不行?后来人家搬去外地,我也只能另找房东。
B:外加失业。
A:看了几家出租的house,最后选了个朝向最好的。
B:你还挺讲究嘛!
A:不挑不行啊!地下室就那么个小窗户,朝向再不好不就关小黑屋了?
B:真够可怜的。
A:也不是那么可怜,至少桌球啦,钓鱼器械啦,滑雪用具啦,应有尽有。
B:都在你屋里搁着呢。
A:住了不到一年,觉得这种不见天日的生活还是不能长久。
B:太压抑。
A:一咬牙,租了个Penthouse
B:顶楼应该光线充足。
A:光线是真不错,空气也特别流通,视野开阔!唯一的不足就是这个墙是斜着的,直不起腰。
B:阁楼啊!
A:没啥,我原先坐火车最喜欢卧铺。
B:离天那么近,还可以假想自己是宇航员。
A:总之那几年是熬过来了。后来当了博后,结了婚,再穷也要住像样一点儿。
B:不能再凑合了。
A:租了个一室一厅,房子本身倒没什么可夸的,但地角实在太好了,交通方便呀!
B:离高速公路不远?
A:就在头顶上。
B:地铁站?
A:脚底下。
B:加油站?
A:隔壁。
B:住加油站隔壁,你不担心起火什么的?
A:不怕,消防局就在对面儿。
B:好嘛,这还能睡得着觉吗?
A:我睡觉还行,但我太太受不了。经常半夜起来坐在床上玩手提电脑。
B:干嘛不去厅里?
A:厅里不是睡着研究生嘛!
B:不忘帮助后来人。
A:你还别说,这房子还真帮了那个学生忙了。
B:怎么回事?
A:有天半夜,这孩子突然大叫肚子疼,看样子像急性阑尾炎。
B:那快叫救护车啊!
A:叫救护车干嘛?医院急诊室的大门离我们家比离他们的garage还近。
B:真方便啊!
A:进了医院登记,护士要我们填emergency contact。我说打电话多麻烦呐,有事儿找我们夫妇就冲二楼走廊尽头的窗户外喊一嗓子就得了。
B:邻居。
A:后来总算找到发考题工作了。几年前买了两万尺的靠海别墅,外加私人海滩和十五亩地。
B:这么大块儿地,你都干啥呀?
A:也没干什么,就是偶尔散个步什么的。
B:没种点儿花花草草?
A:种了些珊瑚。
B:种那个干啥?
A:一涨潮都在水下面儿泡着呢。
B:这么个十五亩地啊!
A:房子一共四层。
B:这么大的空间,都怎么布置?
A:先说地下室,我们可没那么多乱七八糟的东西放。全部用来建停车场。
B:那能停不少车。
A:一楼是游泳池和餐厅。二楼建个豪华影院。
B:那叫一个爽!
A:三楼全部搞成客房。顶楼是我们夫妇的超级大卧室。
B:神仙日子呀。
A:每到周末可忙了,在游泳池就呆一上午。
B:那不累吗?
A:还好吧,大部分时间在梯子顶上坐着。
B:救生员呐!
A:下午连放三场电影。
B:能吃得消吗?
A:想看就看,不想看就去后面的小屋读书去。
B:只管播放。
A:我跟太太胃口都好,中午和晚上都要炒几十个菜。
B:忙得过来吗?
A:所以请了工人帮忙。
B:吃完晚饭该休息了吧?
A:休息啥?客人要求多着呢。一会儿要咖啡,一会儿要加被褥。
B:你们真好客啊!
A:我们就是好客的人。为了他们找我们方便,干脆去高速公路旁边竖了个牌子,告诉他们我们家怎么走。
B:那晚上总要休息吧?
A:十点后就差不多忙完了。去我们的顶楼大卧房,真是视野开阔,空气流通。
B:这日子过得!
A:就是有一点儿,墙都是斜着的,直不起腰。
B:那还不如搬到三楼客房算了。
A:不行啊,客房都满了。
B:不能叫客人去楼上住吗?
A:折腾人家不好,人家第二天一早还要开车呢。
B:家庭Motel呀!

(鞠躬)




Monday, March 16, 2015

【相声】夫妻店

A:这个Academia呀,夫妻店现象太普遍啦!
B:是吗?这是好事儿吧。
A:有好,也有不好。
B:怎么个不好了?
A:拿我原先做薄厚的时候来讲吧,我做的实验,经常要order supply,所以老得麻烦 lab manager。每次都得堆着笑脸求人家,怕人家不耐烦。
B:这是那人的工作呀,有啥可担心?
A:她不是老板娘嘛!
B:那是不能不注意。
A:老板娘在乎老板的生意,凡事都要精打细算,买最合算的。实验室用剩的仪器,舍不得扔,都拿回家了。
B:都什么仪器啊?
A:比如键盘之类的。
B:拿回去有用。
A:每次我跟她说,又得进鼠粮了,她就冲我一撇嘴,你挺能吃的啊?
B:这怎么说话来着?
A:我说,我那几只老鼠是挺能吃的。她说,你确定只是你们几个吃的?
B:什么叫你们几个呀!
A:会不会是给他们吃了?她伸手指了下靠窗那几个桌子。当时坐在那儿的几个博士差点儿跳起来跟她急。
B:是得急。
A:我连忙过去解释,说不是指你们。这面墙有个洞,里面有几个外来的,说的是它们。
B:你人真好,要我就由着他们打。
A:然后老板娘又问我,上次那个品牌吃着还好?
B:怎么老听着这么别扭!
A:我说看我那几个家伙的体重,应该还好。她说这有一个好牌子正在打折,不如咱尝尝这个?
B:叫她自己去尝吧!
A:我想了一下说,还是别了。万一吃上瘾,将来不打折了怎么办?
B:想得真周到。
A:她说,没白跟我这么久啊!
B:谁跟谁呀!
A:每次有女学生来找王教授,一进实验室,老板娘就说了,他忙,有事儿跟我说吧。
B:她做得了主嘛!
A:平常还好,就怕两口子闹别扭。比如上次老板娘的娘来了,老板忙着给动物做手术,没能亲自去接。
B:那也是没办法的事呀。
A:可老板娘不这么想。“做人呀,有时还真不如做个动物!”
B:这话说的。
A:来实习的小本不知道个中情由,跟着附和:是啊,隔三差五一堆人来检查动物,谁管过我们啦?
B:老板娘说啥?
A:可不是嘛!整天knock out, knock out的,当心别把自己的良心给knock out了。
B:这家里的事儿,还是别带到工作上来。
A:说完了翻药箱去了。一边翻一边说,亏咱们还是做老鼠的,连老鼠药都没有。
B:这听着挺吓人的。
A:有次跟老板出去开会,老板偷偷跟我诉苦。说你看老赵前一阵儿跟老婆吵架,每天半夜才回家。老吴和lab manager闹矛盾,好几天没来上班。
B:有这种事儿?
A:冲我一排胸脯:我躲哪儿去啊?
B:真不容易啊!
A:也有让人感动的时候。比如那次实验室快没钱了,为了keep running,老板娘决定,钱都用来给我们发工资了,不买supply了。
B:这怎么成?
A:自己动手,丰衣足食。我们显微镜用的切片,都是老板娘亲手割的玻璃。
B:不容易。
A:滤光的filter,是老板娘的丝袜。
B:这能行吗?
A:氯化钠用光了,老板娘把家里的食盐拿来提纯。
B:能提的纯吗?
A:一边提纯一边嘱咐老板:记得下次别买加碘的啊!
B:多一趟工序。
A:做手术前一天发现用来缝suture的needle断了。害得她忙了一宿。
B:忙啥呀?
A:只要功夫深,铁棒磨成针。
B:有毅力!
A:后来我找到工作了,独立出去了。
B:再见不到这些子事儿了。
A:谁说的?到了新单位没多久,发现chair只要跟dean闹矛盾,就跑去秘书哪里诉苦去了。
B:这都什么乱七八糟的!
A:秘书是provost的小姨子啊。
B:原来如此。
A:后来又要招新同事。叫了四个来面试,我挺纳闷的。几个candidates水平怎么差别这么大呀!
B:都是怎么个样?
A:最好的是咱们同胞,女的,虽然自己带两个孩子,研究做得真不错。
B:为啥自己带两个孩子?
A:老公在外地。但是其他几个可真不敢恭维。
B:那还给叫来?
A:一个是同事A的老婆。
B:这可得照顾。
A:问题是这个同事之前弄了个老婆过来,又离了,按说已经用光了他的名额了。
B:这还分名额的?
A:而且同事B强烈反对,说这种档次的招来,丢我们学校的脸呀!
B:这说得有点儿过分吧?
A:不过分,B就是A的前妻。
B:原来如此。
A:A一听,你要这么说,那我无论如何也不能同意招这第三个candidate了!
B:那为啥呀?
A:这第三个是B的新老公。
B:真够乱的啊!
A:这第四个candidate就更不靠谱了。
B:又怎么了?
A:他是同事C的男朋友。大家就劝C,说你不如再等两年?你们要是最后成了还好,要是成不了,将来整天见面多尴尬!
B:有先例在这儿。
A:最后折腾了半天,总算大家还是顾全大局的,决定把我们的同胞录取了。
B:这好啊!
A:好是好,就是有一点儿,我以后周末不能随便加班了。
B:你老婆呀!
(鞠躬)

推荐相声:天外飞仙
http://fionarawsontile.blogspot.com/2016/01/blog-post.html








Wednesday, March 11, 2015

Free Kindle Books (Maura's Gate---Sci Fi Series)

The Lost Jupiter, 3rd story of the science fiction series, Maura's Gate, has just been released on Amazon. Starting tomorrow, all three stories can be downloaded for free for a few days.

The Lost Jupiter

It begins with a message---a warning written in English from the last place in the solar system one would look for life. When Devin, a senior NASA astronaut, takes the mission to Jupiter, his goal is to reestablish the conversation. Yet after he has traveled through fierce storms into deadly oceans, he discovers that the human future may rely on a secret of the universe that traces back to hundreds of centuries ago, as well as his ability to win a game---a game of lost and found.

1st, Clam
2nd, Rosetta


And the novel, The Starlight Fortress, will be on sale ($0.99).


Sunday, February 22, 2015

On Procrastination


“Get it down. Take chances. It may be bad, but it's the only way you can do anything really good.” (William Faulkner)

It doesn’t feel good, right? The guilt, the self-contempt, when you are replying non-urgent emails, perfecting powerpoints, checking online news, while knowing well that you have this impending deadline for an important project you haven’t even started. Despite all the grand excuses, you knew what this is all about and loath yourself for not being a better person, because procrastination is ascribed to the dread of hard work.

Well, don’t be so harsh on yourself. Indolence may not be the true story. More than often, what you are afraid of is the failure to pass an unrealistic criterion. For example, you have a deadline for a grant, and your goal is to write a top-notch proposal that will get you funded the first time and eventually secure your tenure. Then no wonder you keep putting it off, because you’ve made the task unnecessarily difficult. To accomplish that goal, the proposal will have to be exquisitely crafted, let alone the science part. The story needs to hold interest; every sentence has to be punchy or precise or informative. With that goal in mind, you see the sweat, the struggle waiting ahead, but above all, the frustration of not meeting your standard despite all the effort.

Some people say, “Deadlines are the most effective cure for procrastination.” Effective, maybe, but not a good cure, because it takes time to produce quality work. A common myth about deadlines is that, as long as you finish the project by that time, it makes no difference when you do it. The truth is, the sooner you start working on something, the better. If you wait until you are left with just enough time to finish it, chances are that adverse situations will pop up, demanding time and attention. An unexpected visitor, a sick family member, car breaking on the street. Worse than those, your computer got a virus. You’d be ill-tempered and resentful since you have reserved all the time till the deadline for the project. The longer the waiting, the higher the risk. You swear that next time you’ll start earlier. No use. Similar scenarios will reoccur unless you change the habit. How about setting up an early deadline by yourself, the so-called soft deadline? Tell yourself that the deadline is a week before the official date. Try it, if you haven’t. Never worked for me.

Timing matters especially when the project involves other people. You know you will do it, eventually, but they don’t. Until you have handed them the final product, they’ll be constantly worried about whether you’ll make it. So, ask yourself two questions: do you have to do this, sooner or later? If you do, will finishing it sooner make others’ life easier? If yes, why wait, unless there are more important tasks on your list? This is not to say we should always treat other people’s requests with higher priorities. Do things in the order determined by their values and urgencies. There are circumstances in which we need to purposely delay certain duties. There are times we have to act at the last minute. But overall, try not to adopt a management style that’s deadline-driven.

Some people say, “The best way to prevent procrastination is to get yourself excited about what you have to do.” That would be nice, but how? We enjoy doing something only after we have started it, and the biggest problem with procrastination is that we keep fooling ourselves that we don’t have to deal with it now. “It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare; it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.” (Seneca, 3 BC - 65 AD).

Always on alert for excuses you find for postponing a demanding task. In fact, fulfilling other people’s requests promptly, getting minor jobs done as soon as possible, those legitimate duties might just be your excuses. This type of disguised procrastination is harder to overcome because you appear to be justified. “I have to take care of these things eventually. I’m dealing with them now so that later I can concentrate on the big one.” Well, we sometimes overestimate our capacities. What if we only have half of the time that’s needed? Priorities! Always keep that in mind. If something is important to you, it shouldn’t be the one that gets sacrificed. It deserves your attention immediately.

We have all watched this scene in movies: a man or woman sitting at a desk and writing on a blank paper. After a few seconds, he or she crumples the paper and throws it into the nearby basket. More paper, and eventually a full basket. Now with computers we waste less paper---and reduce the pollution, thank goodness---but we can still waste our time. A whole afternoon is spent working on the first few sentences of an article, typing and revising and erasing. It’s good that we treat the job seriously, but as mentioned above, a high standard only matters for the end result. To get things going, you sometimes have to put up with all the “garbage” in the midst of the progress.

Hemingway said, “The first draft of everything is shit.” I found two implications in this simple quote. First, you are allowed to write an awful first draft. Ask yourself, would you rather have a bad first draft, or no draft at all? To get your ideas straight on the paper, you must refrain from paying attention to rhetoric, because dwelling on word choices and sentence structures may break the flow of your thought. The second advice is that you should never be content with the first draft. Note that this isn’t said by me, a non-native speaker who learned most of her idioms through Googling. Even Hemingway had to revise. Do we write better than him? For example, the article you are reading now has been revised three times. I know, scientific writing is boring; once you have completed the first draft, you can’t wait to put it aside and go on to start something else. Just keep this in mind: if you the author don’t enjoy what you have written, nor will anyone else. This is the time to bring back your high standard. However, if you want to revise and find no time left due to procrastination, that’s another thing.

So my solution is, lower the standard, at least for now. Make it easy enough so it no longer appears to be a daunting task. For example, tell yourself that you will write a proposal that is unlikely to get you funded this time, but will inform you of how your peers think about the project, and may provide you with better ideas on presenting the science or organizing the application, so that in the next round you’ll have a higher chance. Once the pressure has been lifted, you are more likely to hit the road. That’s why I put Faulkner’s quote at the beginning. “Get it down.” Forget about grammar or wording or sentence structures. No one but you will read the first draft. Write it as clumsily and stupidly as you wish. What matters for now is getting it done early, and then we’ll think about how to make improvements. Note that lowering the standard doesn’t mean you’ll end up with an inferior product.  In fact, your chance of being funded will only increase if you have enough time to make revisions and seek critiques.

The larger the project, the stronger your resistance. So the trick is to divide it into small workloads, especially for the first few days, and take one step a time. “Today my goal is to write one paragraph. Then I’m done, and I can enjoy the rest of the day without guilt.” Do that for a few days. If on a particular day you are bombarded, write one sentence at least. Don’t worry about being slow. The key is to establish a routine and get your mind into the mood. We can get used to almost anything we do on a regular basis. If you find yourself pondering on the project when you are not working on it, that’s a good sign. Once the project is coming into shape, however primitive, it’ll no longer appear intimidating and you may finish the rest in one shot. Here is one of my favorite quotes, though not entirely relevant to our topic: “Writing a novel is like driving a car at night. You can see only as far as your headlights, but you can make the whole trip that way.” (E.L. Doctorow)

Last, a warning. While you are self-disciplining, think carefully before you decide to make a commitment. Is it really worth the effort? How likely will your project pay off? Or course, we can never predict the outcome. Didn’t Faulkner say “take chances”? But if you have tried all the tricks and still can’t get yourself started, or you’re working on it but the progress drags, then it could be an indication that you shouldn’t be doing it at all. For example, you saw an attractive funding announcement that doesn’t quite fit your expertise. “Wouldn’t hurt to give it a try,” you may say, while trying your best to make the connection. But think about it. If you the investigator aren’t confident, is it likely to convince other people that your idea deserves their money? Might as well save the time for something more productive, such as finishing the next manuscript.


Monday, February 16, 2015

NIH’s New Biosketch


(Note: the following article is based on personal speculations. It has not been proved to generate successful results. Nor does it represent opinions of NIH agencies.)

On Nov 26, 2014, NIH issued a new Biographic Sketch Format (Notice NOT-OD-15-024) for grant due dates on or after May 25, 2015, but can be used before that. Compared with the old one which mostly involves cutting and pasting bibliographical information, the new format requires substantial effort to make it stand out (or even acceptable if everyone else is trying to stand out). On the one hand, it provides you a valuable opportunity to explain your qualification for the proposal and beef up your resume. On the other hand, you’ll be doomed if you try to do this as a last minute thing. So it’s not a bad idea to start working on it now.

Basically, the old section C, “Peer-Reviewed Publications”, has been replaced by “Contribution to Science”. Here are the instructions.

“The new format extends the page limit for the biosketch from four to five pages, and allows researchers to describe up to five of their most significant contributions to science, along with the historical background that framed their research. Investigators can outline the central findings of prior work and the influence of those findings on the investigator’s field. Investigators involved in Team Science are provided the opportunity to describe their specific role(s) in the work. Each description can be accompanied by a listing of up to four relevant peer-reviewed publications or other non-publication research products, including audio or video products; patents; data and research materials; databases; educational aids or curricula; instruments or equipment; models; protocols; and software or netware that are relevant to the described contribution. In addition to the descriptions of specific contributions and documentation, researchers will be allowed to include a link to a full list of their published work as found in a publicly available digital database such as MyBibliography or SciENcv.”

Intuitively, you would want to fill all “five spots” to impress the reviewers, but unless you’ve really done five completely unrelated projects, I would advise not to do so. For example, you have conducted five projects, ABCDE. A is a significant finding that is worth bragging about. B is an independent project, but somehow has connections to A. C and D share some comment features but are different in other aspects; neither alone is impressive. If you describe them all separately, what will the reviewers bring home with? They will remember A, but certain details may be messed up since B keeps jumping out with its similarity.  They won’t be able to tell either C or D. So, why not just present three themes? After all, we only need one Noble Prize to become famous. Combine similar topics, and make each individual case strong and distinct. That is, strong as evidenced by multiple publications, and distinct from any other topic so that there won’t be confusions.

In terms of presenting each topic, if it was a mentored study, I would briefly mention the place and the advisor’s name, such as “This experiment was conducted during my first postdoctoral research with Prof. XX at Impress-U.” This is because, when we review someone’s application, the first thing we do is take a quick look at the places and labs where the applicant has been trained. Very natural, and a valid reviewing process, because when we rate for the “Candidate”, we are supposed to give a higher score if his mentors have the right expertise in the areas of training he has received. So, mentioning the labs saves the reviewer’s time, especially given the fact that the list of publications has been replaced by an URL, which makes it difficult for the reviewer to take a quick peek as he moves along into different sections. The good thing about providing an external URL for publication list is that you can keep updating it with articles that are published after the proposal has been submitted (remember to do that!).

Similarly, when referring to your publications, adding an Abbreviation of the Journal before or after the year may not be a bad idea. The major reason is not about showing off your “high-profile” (since I don’t have one), but making different publications more distinct and memorable. For example, instead of writing “Me et al. 2008, 2009a, 2010b”, make it “Me et al. 2008, J Right; Me et al. 2009a, J More Right; Me et al. 2010b, J Even Better”. It is very likely that you will keep repeating some of these publications in other parts of the Biosketch. This way it’s easier to link them back to specific topics.

Another presentation tip is to type your own publications in bold. Because the instructions ask you to give some background information about each topic, you may find it necessary to cite other people’s work. You want to be clear about which work belongs to you. This is especially a problem when you are not the first author of a publication. So I would put a small note at the beginning of the section, saying that references in bold are the PI’s own work.

Anyway, these are just my speculations. I look forward to finding out whether the reviewers agree or not!