Wednesday, January 20, 2016

【相声】天外飞仙

By Fiona Rawsontile


A:话说这月圆之夜,紫禁之巅。李胖云虎四大名捕约好了,要到故宫某屋顶上比武去。

B:瞧选这地方。最后谁赢了?

A:倒也没分出胜负。四人刚一跳上去,房顶就塌了。

B:可不是嘛,加起来得有一千斤重。

A:虽然没伤着人,可守故宫的人不干呐!揪住四人要他们赔。

B:这可怎么办?

A:这难不倒他们。老李跟那人说,房顶我有的是,你看着拿吧。

B:够霸气的。

A:出了紫禁城,四人一合计,决定转移到旁边的中南海瀛台岛。

B:为啥非要去那儿呀?

A:那儿清净,还能顺便捉几条鱼回去。

B:都这身材了,还惦记着吃呢。

A:来到红墙外,四人纵身一跃,就翻了进去。

B:好功夫!问题是怎么过湖呀?

A:凌波微步,听说过吗?正朝着岛前行呢,冷不丁冒出个警卫来,拦住四人:这里不许溜冰!

B:那怎么办?

A:这四人哪把警卫放在眼里啊?身形一闪,就不见影儿了。

B:上岛了?

A:掉窟窿里了。

B:看来没冻结实。

A:警卫马上拿对讲机叫来一堆人,费了半天劲把这四人弄上来。一人给一条毛巾。您别说,这么冷的天,人都不带打哆嗦的。

B:和鸭子是一个道理。

A:虎肉兄问警卫:能再给个塑料袋吗?

B:要那干嘛?

A:手里不是都攥着鱼嘛。

B:还没忘了这事儿呢。

A:这一来,惊动了中央领导了,哗哗出来一片。走在前头的是习大大,一看见这四人就乐了。

B:为啥那么高兴?

A:以后再也不会有人叫他习胖子了。

B:嗨!

A:习大大又说了,我叫警卫在这儿钓了一天的鱼,也没弄着一条。你们这么一会儿就捉了七八条?

B:原来窟窿是他挖的。

A:云老师轻哼一声,你当我们四大名捕的称号是白捡的?

B:这么个四大名捕啊!行了,折腾了这么久,赶快回家吧。

A:那可不行,继续到全聚德比去。

B:干脆吃上了。

A:谁叫你提鸭子来着?结果进去一看,人家今天不营业,正在举办一年一度的食神大赛。

B:那就换地儿吃吧。

A:大家一想,虽然比不了武功,能在厨艺上一决高低也不错。

B:都是好胜之人。不过他们突然要求参赛,比赛评委同意吗?

A:评委刚好是四位的老熟人,人称饮食界“坑王”。曾以一款“热坑盐焗鸡”,打败常年霸占食坛的菩提老卤。

B:这热坑盐焗鸡是什么名堂?

A:先在地上挖个坑,倒入海盐。土鸡清理干净,用油纸包好,埋入盐中。上面生上火,一个时辰后取出,咸香扑鼻。每只鸡卖人民币999元,附送黑芝麻糊两袋,客人食后无不大喊坑爹。

B:什么乱七八糟的!还是讲讲比赛的情形吧。

A:第一道菜是胖老师做的墨水大蛋糕。

B:这能吃吗?

A:坑王才吃几口就连声叫好!只觉得满肚子的idea,写起proposal来一泻千里。

B:是得一泄千里。

A:第二道是云老师的:BSSD锦绣键盘。

B:是锦绣拼盘吧?

A:拼成键盘的样子。

B:为啥前面要加个BSSD

A:怕待会儿又上了首页。

B:真够怕老婆的。那虎肉兄呢?

A:当然是他最拿手的那道川菜,回锅铀。

B:不愧是原子岭的老师。

A:坑王边吃边点头:原来是用内功,加快铀裂变的速度,使之在我体内瞬间散发出无尽的能量!

B:哦,偶的天呀。最后轮到老李了吧?

A:他的最简单,是一杯咖啡。

B:这有什么门道?

A:这看似平常的咖啡,坑王只尝了一口,就愣在那里了,随后出口成诗。

B:这么神奇?做的什么诗?

A:冰冷稀湿的夜,奔走。写着OPENsign,在街角召唤。黯淡灯光下,芳华不再。用岁月,搅动苦中带甜的深意。

B:怎么听着像在拍广告呢?

A:据说比赛赞助商是某咖啡店老板娘。

B:那最后谁夺冠了?

A:四人并列第一。

B:恭喜呀!奖品是什么?

A:这奖品说起来可厉害了。现在大家都重视人才。

B:可不是嘛!

A:给予全聚德特聘厨师职位,外加糖浆学者,大鲜人等称号。各配两个编制内的kitchen manager15个全额CA

BCooking Assistant。不知space如何?

A:每人给三个一千尺的大kitchen

B:真羡慕啊!不过你等等,胖老师做的可是wet lab,你们有fume hood 吗?

A:排油烟机是吧?那还用问嘛。我们这儿一律现代装备,炒菜用的都是双蒸水,碗筷都经过autoclave。不信你看看绑餐巾的tape,条纹都变过色了

B:至于嘛!好吧,等哪天我去尝尝。

A:一定要来!他们做的可都是传统美食,什么人鸡界面,麻纳米线,宽带鱼网络。另外,为了让全聚德百年老字号的烤鸭再上一层楼,由李虎二人亲自设计了一种多代理嵌入式移动大明炉。

B:高科技!

A:鸭子进炉前,先用MRI成像,确保健康与完整性。再3D打印一个模型鸭,由云老师根据这个模型,配以全聚德多年积累的烤鸭大数据进行分析,提出三种烧烤方案,经committee审评,敲定一种。再由胖老师在鸭肚里灌入小分子水,外面涂上单层石墨烯,使烧烤中产生的静电可以均匀分布。烤完后拿microtome精确 slice,一片片外焦里嫩,编上号码摆满一盘。

B:终于开吃了!

A:等等,烤鸭毕竟油腻,这道菜的点睛之处,其实在于用来解腻的配菜。说起这样食材,可谓得来不易。常言道,松山有灵叶,只绿悬壁中。又道,兄弟情义重,莫过齐煮餸。

B:没听说过。

A:全靠李胖云虎这天外飞仙的功夫,才能于峭壁之侧,摘得宝物,又飞身入涧,浸于冰凉泉水之中。快马加鞭送至食客桌上,无需烹制,要的就是这天地灵气。吃一口,开肠胃;吃两口,沁脾肺。配在金黄油亮的烤鸭旁边,才算得上是全聚德四大名厨的招牌菜!

B:好!到底是何等珍贵食材?

A:大葱。

(鞠躬)

===================
Read More:

【相声】孔教授


Saturday, December 26, 2015

Quotes of the day III

Most of our faults are more pardonable than the means we use to conceal them. ~François VI de la Rochefoucault

Never be bullied into silence. Never allow yourself to be made a victim. Accept no one's definition of your life; define yourself. ~Harvey Fierstein

We should be taught not to wait for inspiration to start a thing. Action always generates inspiration. Inspiration seldom generates action. ~Frank Tibolt

"In good prose (says Schlegel) every word should be underlined!" that is, every word should be the right one; and then no one would be righter than another. There are no italics in Plato. ~Augustus William Hare and Julius Charles Hare, Guesses at Truth, by Two Brothers, 1827

It is with words as with sunbeams. The more they are condensed, the deeper they burn. ~Robert Southey

Love is like a friendship caught on fire. In the beginning a flame, very pretty, often hot and fierce, but still only light and flickering. As love grows older, our hearts mature and our love becomes as coals, deep-burning and unquenchable. ~Bruce Lee

Procrastination is like masturbation. At first it feels good, but in the end you're only screwing yourself. ~Author unknown, possibly from Monty Python?



Friday, December 25, 2015

穿越唐宋做苦逼小AP

By Fiona Rawsontile


人家写了个高雅的【穿越唐宋做小资】,给我改编成低俗的【穿越唐宋做苦逼小AP】。

1,穿越唐宋做小资
唐诗:田园有宅男,边塞多愤青。咏古伤不起,送别满基情。人妻空房守,浪子卧青楼。去国伤不起,满怀平戎忧。
宋词:小资喝花酒,老兵坐床头,知青咏古自助游。皇上宫中愁,剩女宅家里,萝莉嫁王侯,名媛丈夫死得早,妹妹在青楼。

2,穿越唐宋做苦逼小AP
唐诗:Lab有琐男,funding多被拒。领导是祖宗,小蜜勤打理。放假守空楼,开会抱大牛。日夜勤灌水,奔四不言愁。
宋词:闭目想idea,睁眼看细胞,,养个千老总想跑。小本来要分,博士不上道,码工常取笑。 骑驴找马没走了,终身在烂校。



Monday, December 14, 2015

Interview with Dr. Yiran Chen

                                By Fiona Rawsontile, Dec 2015

I think I could say that whoever knows Dr. Chen, personally or professionally, would agree that his career, while still in a young and aspiring stage, is purely legendary. I’m excited to find out what I’m going to learn from him today.

Fiona: After you have graduated from Purdue with a Ph.D., you worked in industry for five years. Why did you decide to go back to academia?

Dr. Chen: I was asked this question by many of my colleagues and students. The truth is that the research lab I was working in was dismissed during the last economic crisis. The company deployed all the researchers to product departments as R&D engineers, including me. However, having been “spoiled” by the freedom offered by the research lab, I was unable and unwilling to adapt myself to the life of an ordinary engineer. So after nine months, I quit and joined my current university. The manager did not even know I had a Ph.D. until my resignation, or maybe they simply did not care.

Fiona: When people talk about your achievements, they often mention your wife, who’s an equally accomplished engineer in the same field. How would you describe your professional relationship with her?

Dr. Chen: My wife is my (without “one of the”) best partner in my career. We had the same Ph.D. Advisor at Purdue, and now we are working in the same department of our institution. As a couple, we simply 100% trust each other in all aspects. (Fiona commented: That can be boring sometimes.) For example, you never need to worry about if your editing on her draft would harm her feeling. I think both of us benefit significantly from this mutual trust, which makes our collaboration extremely efficient.

Fiona: Do you two discuss about work at home? Who wins more often when disputes occur?

Dr. Chen: Yes, we do discuss about work at home. We have many divergences in our work, but we always manage to reach an agreement when attending to the students. Neither of us always wins, though my wife claims she is the one who often gives in (which is questionable, in my humble opinion).

Fiona: “Love does not consist in gazing at each other, but in looking outward together in the same direction.” (Antoine de Saint-Exupery) Related to the last question, what do you think is the overall condition of engineering women in industry or academia, in terms of competence, promotional opportunities, peer recognition, etc.?

Dr. Chen: Women are normally considered as “minorities” in engineering. Under this presumption, the current systems of both industry and academia provide women engineers and professors with many additional opportunities. In fact, I think academia offers even more than industry through creating special programs or considerations in hiring and research funding. A female engineer or professor is also more visible (say, easier to be noticed or remembered) during daily working contacts. Nonetheless, female engineers and professors often encounter more difficulties when being considered for administrative positions.

Fiona: Do they tend to be better or worse than men with regard to certain skills?

Dr. Chen: In academia, my observation is that female professors are more aggressive (of course, not everyone) than their counterparts in industry. I am not sure whether it means that academic life is harsher, or only the “aggressive” women would choose academia. I don’t see any difference between male or female engineers from technical perspectives, but apparently female engineers take more responsibilities for their families than male engineers. That may explain some of our observations.

Fiona: Your 35-page single-spaced CV told me you must be a genius as well as an extremely busy person. How could you find time for serving as journal editors, conference organizers, panel reviewers, and numerous service and dissertation committees, while maintaining high productivity with several ongoing federally funded projects (there are 14 manuscripts under review at this moment!)? Do you have secrets in time management?

Dr. Chen: You have to prioritize them and attend to the most important tasks first. Not everything is equally important and their value alters at different phases of your career. I work hard, of course, but in academia almost everybody (if not all) is working hard. If I have any secret, I think that is probably motivating my team effectively: my students participate in writing proposals, coordinating meetings with collaborators and funding agencies, and helping with many administrative and logistic duties of mine. Through learning from these extra activity, they become well prepared for the “cruel” society they will be facing upon graduation.

(插入作者高妹/Fiona的话:向大家推荐我正在连载的玄幻---武打---佛道---言情故事《魅羽活佛》,晋江链接:http://www.jjwxc.net/onebook.php?novelid=4880087  故事简介:鬼道中的魇荒门,七个师姐妹都以绝世美颜著称。然而这次的任务中,二弟子魅羽却要化作一个中年油腻肥秃僧,卷入佛国、道门,和修罗界的斗争. 还要让咱们古往今来文采武功都称霸天下的帅哥活佛,对她一见倾心,矢志不渝。)

 晋江文学城链接《魅羽活佛》

Fiona: Considering the short duration you have worked as a college professor, the number of students and postdocs you have trained is impressive. Do you mentor them on an individual basis or rely mostly on lab culture and peer supervision?

Dr. Chen: We have two types of meetings – weekly 1-1’s and small study-group meetings. We have only one general group meeting per semester because it is hard to find a meeting room for 40 people and such a meeting is often inefficient. With a hierarchical personnel structure, senior students help me mentor the juniors. I monitor students’ research progress through 1-1 meetings, which I try my best to protect even considering my busy travel schedule, as well as weekly reports. I usually tell them what I want to see rather than what they need to do. They figure out the details by themselves or with other students. Luckily, our group is sufficiently large so that they can always find an expert to answer their questions. I have never laid off any students (so far), but our peer pressure is huge with so many productive members. In short, we run as an efficient team, in which individual genius is not critical.

Fiona: Now that all of you students are productive and competent, can you tell which ones are more likely to succeed as scientists, which ones should aim at industrial leadership? Has anyone disappointed you with his/her decision?

Dr. Chen: First of all, not ALL of them are productive or competent. People like to imagine that we have different requirements of personal characteristics for scientists and industry leaders. Unfortunately, this presumption does not hold. There are common personality traits shared by both roles: persistence, diligence, teamworking … I am happy as long as my students become successful, be it academia or industry.

Fiona: Hollywood likes to portrait us scientists as long gray haired nerds who have little idea about how the society outside our labs functions. Tell us about the online bookstore you cofounded as a college student. Are you still participating in the management? Do you have plans for other types of business in the future?

Dr. Chen: I quit from the online-store business around 2004 and am no longer a part of the team. Since then, many of the people I worked with have become important figures in the Chinese Internet industry. That was one of my most valuable investments in terms of personal connections. In China, there is a popular saying, “Personal connection is the first productive force”. Although meant to be a joke, it does state a truth that your reputations and personal connections are vital for your career, and I carefully maintain them. In addition, if you have gone through the whole process of building a startup, you would know whom you want to work with, what you can and cannot do. I like trying new things, and I will experiment with some kind of start-up in the future. In fact, I think we have already come up with some good ideas, and we’ll see.

Fiona: Entrepreneurial mindset is currently a hot topic in the engineering disciplines. For students who are still pursuing their degrees, do you think it helps to bring up their awareness of industrial opportunities, risk management, etc., or would you rather have them focus on basic engineering skills, e.g., signal processing, without being overly distracted?

Dr. Chen: Although I started my own company when I was a M.S. student, I am generally against the idea of sacrificing your study for commercial opportunities. I still remember when I told the advisor of my M.S. thesis how “successful” my start-up was, he said, “I agree with you that you might have learned things that extend beyond the scope of school, but the reason we still need education is that other things, some of which are essential in the make of a scientist or a businessman, can ONLY be taught at academia.” Those are the words that will be kept in my mind forever and shared with my students.

Fiona: Would you also like to share the experience of organizing the concert for two famous singers at Tsinghua?

Dr. Chen: Ahha! Jian Li and Jie Miao are very famous now, and I’m happy to have witnessed their growth in our young age and early stage of their career. I was the producer of that concert, and I still consider it as one of my proudest accomplishments. You wouldn’t believe we only spent RMB12000 organizing the whole concert, and I still owe one of the two singers RMB2000 for the recording tapes we used.

Fiona: Did the concert bring back enough gross to cover the expenses?

Dr. Chen: No. If I remember correctly, the admission was free because ticket pricing would have taken a long time to be approved. You can imagine how hard it was to get a ticket. Many famous singers and musicians attended the concert: “Lao Lang”, Gengxu Lu, Xiaosong Gao, Jie Li … After the concert, we had an exclusive party for the rest of the night in a pub named BlueJay in the university neighborhood. I met Jian and Jie again at the 60th anniversary party of the department I graduated from, and we were glad to see all of us doing well in our own careers.

Fiona: An experience like that would certainly be remembered. Could you have become an artist yourself?

Dr. Chen: My mom has a B.S. degree in music, but I failed to inherit the talents from her. I enjoy art and music, but I don’t want to pretend to be an expert.

Fiona: Your research covers the areas of embedded systems, memory and sensing, nano-devices, etc. Which topic do you think has the potential of making the largest impact?

Dr. Chen: As computer engineers, my wife and I have started gaining attentions for our research on emerging memory technologies. We recently shifted to brain-inspired computing, which is believed to revolutionize the computer industry by allowing computer to “think” like a human being. We are still far from this ultimate goal, but we have already seen light above the horizon. I’d like to use the following sentence to summarize our research: “I imagine a world where the difference between man and machine blurs, where the difference between humanity and technology fades, where the soul and silicon chip unite.” (Raymond Kurzweil, “The Age of Intelligent Machines”)





Tuesday, December 8, 2015

【相声】航班风波

By Fiona Rawsontile


A:  这么久没见,出差了?
B:  我是去警局协助调查去了。
A:  查谁呀?
B:  查我自己。
A:  你给逮起来了!为啥事儿呀?
B:  还不就是给黑心的航空公司闹的。上次我回国讲学归来,你说我给了他们那么多钱,才分我那么一把小椅子坐。
A:  家里宽敞,你怎么不在家里坐着?
B:  这飞机还没起飞,我就两腿发麻了。不行,我得到过道里溜达溜达。
A:  伸伸腿儿。
B:  走了会儿一看,咦,这儿有个座位不错!大皮椅子,手脚都能伸展得开。前面还有窗户,视野开阔。
A:  你就坐那儿了?
B:  还说呢,没坐多久,就来了一个穿制服的男的,“先生对不起,我得准备起飞了。”
A:  你跑机长的座位上去啦!
B:  我是一边起身,一边叹气啊。你说这遥控飞机都发明那么久了,还搞个机长干啥呀?
A:  这飞机要是遥控的,你敢坐吗?
B:  从驾驶舱出来,我没走几步,又给我看到一个宽敞的好位置。
A:  你也不能想坐哪儿坐哪儿呀。
B:  没人坐我怎么不能坐?我正在这儿闭目养神呢,发现有人推我。
A:  人家来了呗。
B:  我说真没礼貌!没看我这儿休息吗?
A:  这是人家的位置呀!
B:  怎么成了他的位置了?我先坐下的呀。
A:  你以为这是公共汽车呢,先来后到。
B:  那人见我不走,把空中小姐叫来了。我说叫他坐我那儿不就得了。
A:  你说得容易,人家那个位子好几万呢。
B:  一个烂椅子卖好几万,还不给带走,你说这航空公司黑心不黑心?得抵制它。
A:  下飞机把椅子搬走?没听说过。
B:  这时候周围的乘客都要我走,你说这年头,道德败坏,真是墙倒众人推啊!
A:  还说人家道德败坏。
B:  我大喝一声!别以为我好欺负的,我可是身负武功。
A:  练过。
B:  先漏两手震震他们。我于是离开座位,来到过道,就地儿使了一套地堂拳。
A:  打起滚儿来了。
B:  这时候机长闻风赶来了,说叫我离机。
A:  你扰乱秩序了。
B:  我能怕他吗?我一个鲤鱼打挺,站起身来。丹田提气,只听啪地一声!
A:  你用内力击他?
B:  我拿吐沫吐他。
A:  这素质。
B:  机长立刻拿起电话,没多久,警察带着警棍和警犬都来了。
A:  你闹大了!
B:  别以为能依多取胜。我伸手往怀里一掏,把枪掏出来了。
A:  你还带着武器呀?
B:  我可是美国人,什么弄不到?我对着这帮恶警们就滋了起来。
A:  水枪啊?怪不得没查出来呢。
B:  这下可把警察们惹火了,大叫一声:“关门,放狗!”
A:  这可糟了。
B: 就见一人手一扬, 一条四尺长的大黄狗,红着眼睛,张着血淋淋的大嘴,就向我扑来。只听嗷的一声!
A:  你受伤了?
B:  我把狗咬了。

(鞠躬)

推荐相声:天外飞仙
http://fionarawsontile.blogspot.com/2016/01/blog-post.html








Tuesday, November 24, 2015

Interview with Dr. Tom Yin


I’m very excited to have Dr. Yin here, not only because he is my former postdoc adviser, but because during the four years I worked with him, when he was overburdened with administrative duties, we never had a conversation as long as this one.

Fiona: Your independent research began at University of Wisconsin Madison 38 years ago. Over the years, what was the biggest change you have observed in the way people conduct research?

Dr. Yin: I think the biggest difference is that faculty now spend much more time writing grant proposals than I did. Of course the reason for that is the present prolonged period of tight funding compared to when I started out. Funding has usually been rather cyclical with up and down cycles but the present 5-10 year severe depression is very worrisome, especially as there is no end in sight. During most of my research career, one expected to get funded when applying to NIH. Nowadays, it seems like the hope is not to be triaged! As a consequence I only wrote about 10 grant proposals during that 38 year period. Nowadays, PIs are writing that many proposals in 2 or 3 years!! I couldn’t possibly come up so many ideas for grants.

Fiona: As a young investigator, I totally agree. If the overall funding situation remains, could you think of strategies the government may adopt to ease up the competition?

Dr. Yin: One of the irritating aspects of present NIH funding is that there are quite a few very large laboratories that have multiple NIH grants. I personally know several labs with 8 and 9 R01 grants. I believe NIH is now implementing a policy to prevent this from happening, but I would strongly recommend that some reasonable cap (two or three) be implemented on the number of NIH grants to any given P.I. Obviously some policy on collaborative grants needs to be included in such a rule.

Fiona: Your lab is stuffed with equipment my age. Are there advantages of using primitive electronics over the fancy ones made more recently?

Dr. Yin: No, I just have a difficult time throwing anything away so the old equipment stays in the lab.

Fiona: Really? I thought there were old-equipment magic. At the moment, what is the biggest obstacle in the auditory research that hinders further advancement of the field? In other words, what existing problem would you like to be solved first?

Dr. Yin: I think the biggest problem in brain research, not just auditory, is to understand how the nervous system integrates information from individual neurons to produce perception, action, decisions, and other higher order functions. We now know a lot about how individual neurons respond to different stimuli or to produce different actions, and under different behavioral conditions but we understand very little about how the responses of many neurons are integrated to generate behavior. In visual research this is often referred to as the binding problem: how does the CNS take information about the shape, color, orientation, 3D form, etc. of an object which appears to be encoded by different visual areas and put it all together to give us a percept of a person running, for example.

Fiona: When a large department with a long history recruits new faculty, what are the major considerations people tend to have?

Dr. Yin: There are a number of important considerations that departments generally have when looking to hire new faculty. Among them are the following: the faculty member has a history of productive research as judged by publications during the graduate and post-doctoral years, that he/she is doing interesting and important research that has a high likelihood of getting funded in the future, sometimes departments are looking for faculty working in specific areas, indications that the faculty member will be a good colleague within the department and school with interest in collaboration with existing labs, and the faculty member will be a good mentor and teacher.

Fiona: You’ve trained more than a dozen graduate students and postdocs. Despite the escalating competition, all but two successfully landed jobs in academia. Did you only recruit students who were willing to make a commitment, or was there a secret in how you mentored them?

Dr. Yin: No, I don’t think I ever asked a student if they were interested in an academic career, at least not when they applied to work in the lab so this was not a way to screen potential students. I think I was lucky to find students and postdocs who were really talented and hardworking and also really liked doing science and just wanted that to be their career. Having a productive graduate and postgraduate experience also helps.

Fiona: I still think there has to be something more than luck. Would you like to offer some advice to young researchers in their earlier careers?

Dr. Yin: I always tell students who are considering a research career that the most important thing to me is that you be excited about doing research. It’s unlikely that you will become rich or famous in academia, so what has to drive you during the inevitable hard times when experiments aren’t working or funding is tight or reviewers are obstinate is the love of the science. So if you aren’t excited about coming into the lab in the morning, then try to work on a problem that will get you excited.

Fiona: And if we fail in the end, at least we’ve had some wonderful time. That might be too permissive. Let me put it the other way: if we are excited about what we do, we have a better chance of getting the reviewers excited. Okay, thank you so much, my mentor! I wish you a happy retirement (with still more teaching responsibilities, of course)!


Sunday, November 22, 2015

Interview with Dr. Yitang (Tom) Zhang


I recently had a phone interview with Dr. Zhang, Professor of Mathematics at University of New Hampshire. Although brief, our conversation left me with the impression that he is a humble and dedicated scientist who does not cease taking new journeys in the area of Number Theory after the receipt of the 2014 MacArthur Award.

Fiona: You once disputed the view of mathematicians as geeks who have few connections with the real world. Do you ever feel the need to discuss your projects with your peers?

Dr. Zhang:  I used to spend many hours thinking about mathematics without communicating with other people. To me, the initial exploration of a new problem involves a lot of intuition. You may have some feeling about the possible strategies that could work or the direction it’s heading toward, but articulating your thoughts to others can be difficult. The nature of my research determines that I’m not in a business that invites teamwork or benefits from collaborations. A mathematician needs to endure solitude, and I have been avoiding activity that’s unlikely to yield a meaningful outcome.

Fiona: That’s interesting. What you have described sounds almost like artistic creation. What got you interested in the study of twin primes conjecture? How would you summarize its impact?

Dr. Zhang: I have known this conjecture for many years. It is interesting to many people, not only to me. I think it’s possible that more hypotheses in this area may stem from my work, but that could take a while and, for now, it’s not clear.

Fiona: You once said there are other on-going projects you are proud of, but wouldn’t want to throw them out yet?

Dr. Zhang: Yes, but it is not easy to describe them right now. All I can say is that they don’t quite belong to the same category of the problem I have just solved. And I can’t map out a timeline when they might be finished. It could happen one day unexpectedly, just like the last time.

Fiona: How does your mind engage in different research topics?

Dr. Zhang: I used to concentrate on one problem, but also try to know what happened to others. To me, there is no boundary that separates work from the rest of my life. When I’m working on a problem, it lingers in my mind all the time.

Fiona: In physics, a law doesn’t have to be unconditional or universal to be valuable. People constantly bring up new theories that overwrite an old principle or exceed its limit. Is being right or wrong more absolute in mathematics? Do you agree with what Michio Kaku said about God being a mathematician?

Dr. Zhang:  In mathematics the situation might be different. For example, it was Euclid who first proved that there are infinitely many prime numbers. Today we can only say this is true. Although sometimes I do marvel at the exquisite structure of math and its power to explain the physical world, generally I’m not a philosophical person who likes to dwell on the origin or purpose of life.

Fiona: If you were given a chance to go back in time and rebuild your career, would you have done anything differently? Did you remain optimistic during the days when things didn’t work out?

Dr. Zhang: I might have done something differently, as I have learned many lessons from my academic career. For example, at the beginning, I should have listed all possible methods that could apply to my problem; once I ignored some of them, I wasted time. But I used to be optimistic, as I regarded the difficult time was just the start of a new road.

(插入作者高妹/Fiona的话:向大家推荐我正在连载的玄幻---武打---佛道---言情故事《魅羽活佛》,晋江链接:http://www.jjwxc.net/onebook.php?novelid=4880087  故事简介:鬼道中的魇荒门,七个师姐妹都以绝世美颜著称。然而这次的任务中,二弟子魅羽却要化作一个中年油腻肥秃僧,卷入佛国、道门,和修罗界的斗争. 还要让咱们古往今来文采武功都称霸天下的帅哥活佛,对她一见倾心,矢志不渝。)

 晋江文学城链接《魅羽活佛》

Fiona: You mentioned you don’t like the distractions of a large team. Do you plan to recruit students in the near future?

Dr. Zhang: I have been considering this problem, but no decision has been made. In the past few years, I have received several applications from prospective students, most of whom were Chinese. Because those were not full applications but Letters of Interest, with limited mentoring experience, I was uncertain how to judge the qualification of the applicant and whether a match existed.
            Of course, I want my students to eventually become masters of the field, not just qualified graduates who could find jobs. In the past summers, I was invited to spend time in the Chinese Academy of Sciences, where I saw clear talents in their students. I have been interacting with and advising a few of them, but a formal relationship is yet to be established.

Fiona: I hope something would work out soon. What is your favorite course to teach?

Dr. Zhang: It is hard to say. I love teaching various courses. Giving lectures in a classroom is different from mentoring graduate students. I have more experience with the former but little with the latter.

Fiona: Would you like to say something about the western academia and scientists in their early careers?

Dr. Zhang: What the academia here attracts me the most is the freedom to pursue topics we are interested in. I’d like to tell the young scientists: if you really love sciences, do not give up easily.